|
Post by aca on Feb 13, 2007 14:33:17 GMT 3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2007 19:49:24 GMT 3
I'm not surprised, Turks and Native Americans are connected. We used to be the same wayyyy back in the day.
|
|
|
Post by Verinen Paroni on Feb 13, 2007 21:43:03 GMT 3
I'm not surprised, Turks and Native Americans are connected. We used to be the same wayyyy back in the day. Do you mean all Native Americans? I know Altaic connections just with Tlingits, Aleutians and other thosekind of nations in USA and Canada.
|
|
|
Post by BAWIR$AQ on Feb 14, 2007 2:41:38 GMT 3
I'm not surprised, Turks and Native Americans are connected. The object above is called "serge". It is a wooden or stone poles in the places where shamanistic rituals were performed. But more oftenly them would just be used to tie the horse and indicated the hospitability of the owner. They are very similar to the totem poles of the Native Americans:
|
|
|
Post by BAWIR$AQ on Feb 14, 2007 2:44:24 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by Verinen Paroni on Feb 14, 2007 2:55:52 GMT 3
I'm not surprised, Turks and Native Americans are connected. The object above is called "serge". It is a wooden or stone poles in the places where shamanistic rituals were performed. But more oftenly them would just be used to tie the horse and indicated the hospitability of the owner. They are very similar to the totem poles of the Native Americans: Those are not made by Indians. I have talked with some Tlingit and he only hated red-skins.
|
|
|
Post by BAWIR$AQ on Feb 14, 2007 3:04:08 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by BAWIR$AQ on Feb 14, 2007 3:05:26 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by Verinen Paroni on Feb 14, 2007 3:56:36 GMT 3
In Indian (Native-American) I mean person like sioux, cheyenne, apache etc... And why you said that "Then it must be Europeans ;D"? I happen to hate Europe (though there lives also good nations) and I'm not european. Those Totems were build by Altaic and Paleo-Siberians relatives in America. Red-skin means typical Indian (mohawk, irokeesh, sioux and so on...).
|
|
|
Post by BAWIR$AQ on Feb 14, 2007 4:17:41 GMT 3
And why you said that "Then it must be Europeans ;D"? I was joking because I misunderstood you. Both "Indian" and "redskin" are derogatory and inappropriate words. Moreover, in my opinion, "redskin" is a racist word. Please, don't use them regarding the indigenous peoples of Americas. You are wrong. Most (if not all) of the indigenous peoples of Americas are descended from peoples living in Siberia. Navajo, Cherokee, Sioux, Apache, Iroquois are also descendants of the ancient Siberians, as well as Mayas, Aztecs, and Incas. "Native American" is the proper term that refers to all of Americas' indigenous peoples.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2007 11:31:51 GMT 3
I'm not surprised, Turks and Native Americans are connected. We used to be the same wayyyy back in the day. Do you mean all Native Americans? I know Altaic connections just with Tlingits, Aleutians and other thosekind of nations in USA and Canada. I don't know much about the Native Americans in Central and South America, I don't think there's a connection with them. I'm talking about North American Native Americans.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2007 11:48:02 GMT 3
I'm not surprised, Turks and Native Americans are connected. We used to be the same wayyyy back in the day. Do you mean all Native Americans? I know Altaic connections just with Tlingits, Aleutians and other thosekind of nations in USA and Canada. Actually, I do remember reading about ancient Peruvians and ancient Turks having many myths and legends which are surprisingly very much the same.
|
|
|
Post by Verinen Paroni on Feb 14, 2007 15:14:11 GMT 3
Few years ago one Finnish professor made research about linguistical similarities between kechuans/quichuans and Uralic-Altaic languages, and there was something. There is no racist words. It is people who made some words to racist. The fact is that they all have came from Siberia. But before people like Tlingits came to there, there was already clovisian culture which was made by those who came first and much before (cherokees, apaches etc...)
|
|
|
Post by BAWIR$AQ on Feb 14, 2007 22:56:49 GMT 3
The fact is that they all have came from Siberia. But before people like Tlingits came to there, there was already clovisian culture which was made by those who came first and much before (cherokees, apaches etc...) They all came from Siberia. Period. Of course people like Tlingit didn't lose their Siberian culture as much as the other Native Americans who spread all over the American continents, but that doesn't mean that you can look down on other Native Americans by calling them "redskin Indians" and so on. "Redskin" and "Indian" are ignorant terms that were invented by the Europeans. You don't like Europeans, but you're eager to copy the ignorant names they use. Clovis culture was the culture of those who came from Siberia thru the Bering Strait. It was prominent in the late ice age. Maybe you wanted to say PRE-Clovis culture?
|
|
|
Post by Verinen Paroni on Feb 14, 2007 23:21:45 GMT 3
It was a Tlingit himself who called them to "filthy redskins" for me. In few years I'll visit to Alaska and ask local people their opinions of those others... Then we both might be more smart. I meant clovis-culture but those who for example built those totems were not part of that clovis-culture but they came much later.
|
|