|
Post by Subu'atai on Jun 12, 2008 21:02:16 GMT 3
Back in the day, we had plenty of wives, yet they were all feminist However, now we're "sorta" lucky, as we can just have one feminist to deal with. Though, how did polygamy stop on the steppes? Just curious
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Jun 13, 2008 23:06:36 GMT 3
Actually, polygamy was always limited for the rulers and the rich, as long as they could afford more than one wife. The ordinary tribesmen were usually monogamist.
|
|
|
Post by Subu'atai on Jun 14, 2008 15:34:40 GMT 3
Ahhh I see, so the 'switch' to monogamy wasn't much of a switch ne ways. Makes sense heh, the progression seemed so natural
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Jun 15, 2008 20:43:54 GMT 3
Yes indeed, it is One example is that, during Ahmad ibn Fadlan's visit to an Oghuz chieftain, the chief asked Ibn Fadlan how many wives did their Allah have ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by sharshuvuu on Jul 11, 2008 17:10:33 GMT 3
Friend of mine told me about an event from the mid-twentieth century. At his university there was a Kyrghyz on the faculty. A guest lecturer from the Kyrghyz SSR came and gave a talk about current conditions, which expressed all the conventional pieties about how they had progressed as a result of being part of the USSR: intertribal enmities were a thing of the past, polygamy had been abolished, &c. After the lecture the sponsoring department took the speaker out to dinner, and the Kyrghyz scholar at the university was in the party, so they seated them together. They regarded each other with some suspicion until they had established that they came from friendly tribes, then they talked happily in Kyrghyz. The speaker turned out to have three wives (two of them were officially "my wife's cousins who live with us"). He had little love for the Soviet system.
Sharshuvuu
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Jul 11, 2008 22:21:19 GMT 3
LOL interesting story ;D
|
|