Brief History of Flintlock Rifles

[H. İhsan Erkoç]

(Originially posted by Arkhanson at September 21, 2004)
----

The Flintlock was developed in France around 1612. A key contributor to this development was Marin le Bourgeoys who was assigned to the Louvre gun shops by King Henri IV of France. The Flintlock's manufacture slowly spread throughout Europe, and by the second half of the century it became more popular than the Wheel Lock and Snaphaunce. The main difference between the Flintlock and Snaphaunce is that in the Flintlock the striking surface and flashpan cover are all one piece, where in the Snaphaunce they are separate mechanisms. This made the mechanism even simpler, less expensive, and more reliable than its predecessor. This simplicity allowed for more creative gun designs, such as guns with multiple barrels and miniature pistols which could be concealed easily inside a garment. By 1664 experiments with rotating-block repeated fire guns were under way (like a revolver which holds a number of shots in a rotating cylinder) but such weapons were dangerous to operate and would have to wait for another century and a half to be made a standard weapon.

In the early 1700s the Brown Bess Flintlock made its appearance. It probably got its name from the acid-brown treatment of its barrel. By this time, the flintlock was accurate up to about 80 yards but nobody could aim at a man and kill him at 200 yards. A shooter of average experience could load and fire two to three rounds per minute. Going through several incarnations, it wasnt until the 1760s that the Brown Bess was standardized.

In the late 1740s, the first Kentucky rifles began to be produced in America. Several gunmakers in the colonies made them, the most famous being those made in Lancaster county, Pennsylvania.

The Percussion Cap ignition system was developed in 1805 by the Reverend John Forsyth of Aberdeenshire. This firing mechanism wass a great step in advancement from its predecessors because it does not use an exposed flashpan to begin the ignition process. Instead, it has a simple tube which leads straight into the gun barrel.

The key to this system is the explosive cap which is placed on top of the tube. The cap contains fulminate of mercury, a chemical compound which explodes when it is struck. This is the same stuff as is used in the paper or plastic caps in a child's cap gun. When the cap is struck by the hammer, the flames from the exploding fulminate of mercury go down the tube, into the gun barrel, and ignite the powder inside the barrel to propel the bullet.

This firing mechanism provided a major advance in reliability, since the cap was almost certain to explode when struck. This mechanism is almost immune to dampness, though in a rainfall one must still be cautious to avoid getting water in the gun barrel or into the ignition system while loading the weapon. The percussion cap was the key to making reliable rotating-block guns (revolvers) which would fire reliably, and in the early 1800s several manufacturers began producing these multiple-shot sidearms in mass quantities. The percussion cap firing mechanism gave an individual soldier a weapon of precision and reliability which was used to devastating effect in the U.S. Civil War.





reference is: ruffcountry.tripod.com/gruffsgunsite/id1.html


----------------


(Originially posted by me at September 27, 2004)
----

Thanks for the post

I like 18th and 19th century flintlock muskets


----------------


(Originially posted by Arkhanson at September 27, 2004)
----

but at 17th centry matchlock rifles were still in using but gun powder of rifle is so bad and you could not take aim clearly and for this reason matchlock rifle bgattlitions were used in armies and pikemans were protecting muslketeers when they where reloading their rifles


----------------


(Originially posted by me at September 27, 2004)
----

But when flintlocks were developed, they became one of the milestones of military history.

The first real useage of them in action was during the War of Spanish Succesion, right?


----------------


(Originially posted by Arkhanson at September 27, 2004)
----

not so much only rifle tactics changed but main evolutions are after the first quarter of 19 century British martini henry rifles German mausers and American wincheters


----------------


(Originially posted by me at September 27, 2004)
----

But with the final development of flintlock muskets, musketeers became the main units of European armies while their efficiancy was highly improved.

Just compare musket-using infantries of Europe during 17th and 18th centuries.


----------------


(Originially posted by Arkhanson at September 28, 2004)
----

I understood it wrong. And also improving of the firearm technologies also tactics were improved


----------------


(Originially posted by me at September 28, 2004)
----

It's also interesting that the wide-spread useage of bayonets started at the same time with flintlock muskets.


----------------


(Originially posted by Arkhanson at September 28, 2004)
----

Kentucky rifles are also good for hunting with flintlock status rifles


----------------


(Originially posted by me at September 28, 2004)
----

Is it true that Kentucky rifles were used for sniping?


----------------


(Originially posted by Arkhanson at September 29, 2004)
----

Well I am not sure but if it is used for hunting also you can use it for sniping. Also you know now a days people use bolt action rifles with scopes deer hunting etc

[H. İhsan Erkoç]

(Originially posted by Arkhanson at September 29, 2004)
----

Ihsan I found this for you:

The Kentucky Rifle is a uniquely American invention, for uniquely American needs. It is the first firearm designed in what was then the colonies, and probably the first mechanical device of any sort designed expressly in the new world.

The origin of the Kentucky rifle comes from German gunsmiths, and the Jaeger hunting rifle. During the 1700's, most ethnic immigrants had a wide variety of landscape to choose from in the colonies, and so they settled in lands similar to home. Much of Appalachia was settled by Scotsmen, as it’s steep mountains and scarce population were almost identical to the Scottish Highlands. In the case of the Germans, the deep, rolling forests of Pennsylvania were remarkably similar to the Black Forest, both in topography and weather. The relatively settled nature of the area gave easy access to the materials and machinery needed to ply their trade. Thus, it was only natural that the Germans would settle in that area, and German gunsmiths would reproduce the forest hunting rifle.

However, they had their work cut out for them, as the Jaeger rifle was not the optimal solution for the explorer of the American wilderness. Our forests at the time had a few unique qualities about them, which set them apart from the Bavarian forests, or any other.

They're larger. Much larger. The Appalachian forests that ran from New York to Georgia covered more territory than all of Germany.

They were largely unexplored, with settlements being few and far between. The traveler in these forests would have to be self sufficient, as trading posts or other sources of supplies could be weeks away, if you could find them at all.

Travel was done almost exclusively on foot, or occasionally with pack animals. This meant that the intrepid explorer had to carry all supplies on their back to last for several months. Weight became a premium concern. This is complicated by the fact that , at the time, a person could not carry more than a week's food supply with them, if even that. Sustinence would need to be derived from the land.

And, being dense hardwood forests, there isn't much in the way of edible plantlife. The tall trees tend to drown out lesser plants, and a hardwood tree, while magnificent to look at, just doesn't do much for the appetite. If you want to survive in a dense forest, animals are your only consistent food supply. And animals existed in plenty, from rabbits to deer - if you could catch them. Short of setting a trap and waiting, your only choice for surviving in the American forests was a rifle. And unlike a weekend in the Black Forest, running out of food in the Appalachian forests meant starvation.

To meet these needs, the gunmakers had quite a few problems to solve. A rifle to accommodate the Appalachian traveler needed several qualities:

It must be lightweight, and its ammunition must be lightweight. Most traveling was done on foot, with all necessary supplies carried by the person. Given the size of the forests, the relative rarity of trails, and dearth of settlements, the explorer had to carry all necessary items to survive for up to six months. Therefore, the rifle, probably the heaviest single item they would be carrying, needed to place weight at a premium.

It must be accurate. Rifles of the day were slow to load, and a gunshot would scare off any animals nearby. That first shot had to count. One also must consider the limited supply of bullets and gunpowder, carried on the person. With a need to conserve bullets and powder, neither available in the forest, every shot must count.

It must have a minimum of special equipment. Anything relating to the operation of the rifle would have to be carried with the explorer. Loss or breakage of special tools, such as a mallet to drive a bullet into the barrel, would render the rifle inoperable, and leave the explorer out of food.

It must be quick to load. Hostile inhabitants of the woods could descend upon the explorer at any time. While the Indians of the time did not generally have firearms, and had great respect for the person who did have one, they did travel in numbers. Excuse me, can you wait while I prepare my rifle. I'll only be a few minutes... to take this to the extreme, Simon Kenton was reputed to be able to reload his Ky rifle in 12 seconds, while running.

To solve these problems, the gunmakers began to evolve the Jaeger rifle into a weapon suitable for the task at hand. They made several changes, unique to gunmakers in the colonies.

The long barrel. This addressed several needs. The very long barrel allowed for open gunsights that could be used in the dark, shady forest, by virtue of placing the rear sight farther from the marksman's eye. You can't hit it if you can't see your sights. A long barrel tends to fire a bullet more consistently, when differing powder charges are used. Game close, use less powder, bullet still goes in the same place. Those who have fired a reproduction of a Kentucky rifle first note the long barrel, which seems rather difficult to aim, as it is nose heavy. However, take the rifle out into dense hardwood forests, and the solution becomes obvious. There is always a tree nearby to rest a hand on to support the barrel. A shortcoming that goes away when you use the rifle within its design parameters.

The smaller caliber. Lighter bullets weigh less, which is critical when you carry your entire supply on your back, and take less powder to shoot, which is critical when you also carry your entire gunpowder supply in a horn. The typical caliber of a woodsman's KY rifle was in the .40-48 range, adequate for the small game that made up the usual explorer's dinner, but also optimized for weight. Smaller caliber bullets also resulted in much lighter barrels, making not only the ammunition, but the rifle itself, lighter.

The patched round ball. One of the most overlooked innovations of the Kentucky rifle is the patched ball. The Jaeger rifle depended upon a tight fitting bullet to get a good gas seal and insure that most of the gunpowder's gas propelled the bullet. The slightly oversized bullet was hard to start in the barrel, and tended to leave lead deposits behind that affected subsequent shots. Consequently, starting the bullet into the barrel was a tedious affair, with an iron (and heavy) rod and mallet (also heavy) to hammer the bullet into the barrel. To solve these two problems, a brilliant but unknown designer used bullets slightly smaller than the barrel, and a greasy patch of cloth to complete the seal. By doing this, the bullet and patch started easy for fast loading, sealed well for maximum power and accuracy, and required no special equipment for loading. No heavy mallet to carry, or to lose or break, leaving one with no food supply. The patched round ball also gave rise to one of the Kentucky rifle's distinctive characteristics: the patchbox on the rifle stock, with which one could easily store a supply of greased patches, and keep them free of the dirt and debris that would normally stick to a greasy cloth.

The slender stock. What gives a Kentucky its unique, and beautiful, appearance. A slender stock simply weighs less than the massive wood stocks of the Jaeger rifles. This was a tradeoff, light stocks are less stable and more fragile than heavy stocks, but the weight factor comes in again: Carry a heavy rifle, and you can't carry much else. Stability was overcome with a tree, and fragility was compensated (probably) by careful handling. Add the all important patch box in the stock, and you now have the complete picture of this rifle's characteristics.

[H. İhsan Erkoç]

A uniquely American invention to solve a uniquely American situation. In the process, some uniquely American habits were also created. Traditionally, American soldiers have been, man for man, the best marksmen in the major armies of the world. This relates directly back to their forest exploring ancestors, where marksmanship made the difference between thriving and starving. That weeded out the less than adequate very quickly. American soldiers have also typically kept their firearms the cleanest and most well maintained. Once again, their ancestors learned this the hard way: dirty gun, no shoot, no food, starve.

When the forests had been fully explored, the need for the Kentucky rifle's unique characteristics went away, and so did its manufacture. As exploration moved into the plains territory of mid America, the rifle of choice was the Hawken. Heavier caliber for the larger game, shorter so that it can be fired without a tree for support, a more suitable rifle for the Plains states.

While long rifles were made into the late 1800s, large scale manufacture had died down by the mid 1800's. And so it would, the forests had been fully explored, settlements established, trails and bridges built. There was no need for a firearm that placed accuracy and weight over handling and hitting power.

Today, most of the examples that can be found in museums and collections are the 'Golden Age' rifles from the Lancaster, PA area. One must remember that these rifles, for the most part, are showpieces, elaborately made for rich landowners. As such, they represent the pinnacle of development, and not the origins. To get a true picture of why this rifle's unique characteristics were developed, one must look to the woodsman's rifle, which was rather plain, usually with a walnut stock and iron accoutrements.

It is interesting to note that a rifle of similar porportions evolved elsewhere, at a later date. These long barreled, slender stocked rifles were found in and around the mountains of Afghanistan, and while no recorded history of their evolution is known to exist, the design appears to be primarily for light weight and accuracy, as it was carried by travelers on foot. Who wants to lug a 10 pound rifle up a mountain? These rifles were usually made as matchlocks, and the examples that turn up on collections were reported to have been brought out in the mid 1970's, by an enterprising group that went into this region with a few cases of Russian shotguns for trade. The designers of these rifles did have to face one problem not encountered in the US: the Afghan mountains have few trees. For this reason, most Afghan rifles, including the example I have, come with a folding bipod.
The earliest documentable reference to a generic name for this unique rifle was 1825, and a song about the battle for New Orleans during the war of 1812. The Hunters of Kentucky extolled the virtues of a Kentucky regiment, perhaps a bit too glowingly, but, hey, it’s a song. In it, there is a line about “Kentucky Rifles”. The song contains no description of a long barreled, slender stocked rifle, just one reference to "Kentucky Rifle". For this reason, it is safe to assume that the name was in use prior to 1825, otherwise those hearing the song would have no clue what the lyrics referred to.

It is also called the Pennsylvania Rifle. As a geographical term, there is merit to this name. The bulk of Kentucky rifles were made in Pennsylvania, though examples were made in just about every state in the Union at the time. However, this rifle was not traditionally referred to as the Pennsylvania rifle. The earliest references I’ve found to “Pennsylvania Rifle” dates to 1928, and Dillon’s book, which makes brief use of the term in a later chapter. To put it in perspective, Dillon’s book is titled: “The Kentucky Rifle”. So, we can reasonably assume that Pennsylvania Rifle is probably a 20th century term, with more of an interest in location than historical signifigance. However, if one uses the term “Pennsylvania Rifle” as a measure of geographical accuracy, the actual name would be ‘The Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia, Kentucky, Indiana, Alabama, and Tennessee Rifle’. That’s a mouthful. And I've probably missed a few states.

Were Kentucky Rifles made in Kentucky? Very few, and most are percussion rifles, built later than 1820. The reason for this relates directly to the reason the rifle was so often used in Kentucky: the dense forests, difficult to pass through. Being hard to walk through on foot, transporting gun making equipment was out of the question. The Northeastern states, with their ports and well developed roads, had ready access to the raw steel and barrel making equipment. It would serve little purpose to have shipped barrels all the way to Kentucky with it’s limited number of trails. Better still, build the rifle elsewhere and carry the completed item to Ky. Three Kentucky based makers come to mind: Joseph Griffith of Louisville, the Settle family of Greensburg, and Mills of Harrodsburg. These were all mid to late 1800s makers, and while the style follows the slender, graceful lines, the period of manufacture made them more of a nostalgic item or a target rifle than a state of the art weapon.

Should it be called the Pennsylvania rifle? A good question. In Connecticut, Samuel Colt invented and made the first repeating pistol, the Colt Revolver. One never hears of the Connecticut pistol, though. Horace Smith and Daniel Beard Wesson devised the first metallic cartridge pistol in Mass. So should any metallic cartridge revolver be named after that state? Now there's a contradiction in terms! In fact, almost no firearms are named for the area that they're made in. Usually, they are named for the inventor, but as no one person invented the Kentucky rifle, that really isnt possible. There is the Springfield rifle, also known as the 03A3, but it is named for the arsenal, not the locale. In any case, this question was supposedly put to rest in the 1960's by the Kentucky and Pennsylvania Historical Societies. They settled the matter with a shooting competition, winner gets naming rights. The Kentucky team handily won the contest.

It is curious to note that a Kentucky Pistol also exists. This is a single shot pistol with a curved grip, and like the rifle, has no real history of being made in Kentucky.

In the end, the historical term “Kentucky Rifle” refers not to it’s location of origin, but the area that molded it’s design, and justified it’s manufacture. When the settlers moved west into the plains area, the rifle of choice was the much shorter Hawken. With pack animals, wagons, and open plains, one could travel easily and carry more food with them, and the absence of trees made the long barrel somewhat unwieldy. Hence, the accuracy and efficiency of the long barrel, and the lower weight of the slender stock, were no longer needed. It was the dense forests of Kentucky that molded the design of this particular rifle. While the rifle could, and was, built outside of Pennsylvania, it would not have existed without the deep, unexplored forests of Kentucky to require its unique characteristics.

Having said all of that, I will close with this simple statement: call it whatever you want to. Over the last 80 years, various historians have come up with new names for this rifle, all insisting that theirs is the 'correct' name. What is the correct name? Whatever you want it to be. Kentucky Rifle is the first recorded name to be applied to this rifle, and certainly one of the most charismatic. Much as I hate to belabor this point, I do get a bit put out with revisionist historians, changing history with as much an eye towards personal glorification as fact.

IT IS TAKEN FROM: johno.myiglou.com/kyrifle.htm