|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Jun 15, 2010 0:07:56 GMT 3
Get over with it man, that guy lived in the 18th century. It doesn't change anything. History is history, books are books, words are words. Do you really think just because a historical knowledge is old makes it absolute? I think exactly the opposite. He simply explains that during the time Turks ruled Persians, Persian changed into a dialect of Turkic. The book is named "İsveççenin Türkçe İle Benzerlikleri - İsveçlilerin Türk Ataları" Sven Lagerbring from "Kaynak Yayınları" Please read the book. Just because his theories sound flattering to you or to Turks in general, and just because he's a foreigner doesn't mean he is scientific and right. Yes, Persian had a lot of Turkic influence and had acquired a lot of Turkic loanwords, but it never became a dialect of Turkic. It's simple fact. Since you don't know even these single facts, there is no need to continue this pointless discussion.
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Jun 15, 2010 0:10:50 GMT 3
It's like using Newton to refute Einstein. Someone from the 18th century did the best he could with the data available to him. If he had the chance to access all the data compiled on the subject since the 18th century, he'd probably throw out his own theories. Yes, I agree.
|
|