pantigin
Tudun
Without Uighurs, there was no Mahmud and without him, there is no complete stories of Turks !
Posts: 164
|
Post by pantigin on Feb 16, 2008 12:58:07 GMT 3
I was told by some of my anatolian friends about an uighur beylik (state) founded in some northern provinces of today's Turkey during the Mongol Ilikhante. I also saw some informations on the web about that short lived state (1327-1380) founded by an Uighur Turk named Ertene. If anyone who knows more and detailed information, please write and we will share. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Temüjin on Feb 16, 2008 20:20:08 GMT 3
mmh didn't someone once claimed that the Osman dynasty is in fact Uyghur?
|
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Feb 16, 2008 22:45:59 GMT 3
Eratna (also known as Eratna/Erdene/Erdini, name coming from Sanskrit "Ratna" meaning "Big Pearl") was the Uyghur-origined Ilkhanid governor of Rûm (Anatolia), centered at Sivas. Following the breakup and initial fall of the Ilkhanid Empire in Iran, Eratna declared himself as an independent ruler. After his death, he was succeded by his young son, but he was deposed by his advizor, Ḳâḍî Burhâne'd-dîn Aḥmed (Qâdî Burhâne'd-dîn Ahmed, known in Modern Anatolian Turkish as Kadı Burhânettin Ahmet) ﻘﺎﻀﻰ ﺒﺮﻫﺎﻦ ﺍﻠﺪﻴﻦ ﺍﺤﻤﺪ, an Anatolian Turk, who founded his own short-lasting state.
|
|
pantigin
Tudun
Without Uighurs, there was no Mahmud and without him, there is no complete stories of Turks !
Posts: 164
|
Post by pantigin on Feb 17, 2008 6:04:47 GMT 3
mmh didn't someone once claimed that the Osman dynasty is in fact Uyghur? Really? If so, that was ridiculious. |
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Feb 17, 2008 13:53:53 GMT 3
I don't think that is possible, because there is nothing to proove that.
|
|
