|
Post by avqust23 on Aug 24, 2011 4:09:00 GMT 3
Hi
I read about a German turkologist who wrote books in the 60s and 70s, and one of his books was basically about the turkic languages being separate from mongolic and that they shouldn't be classified under the same category (altaic), despite any similarities to which he described were consequential to the geographic circumstances that made cultural exchange between the two respective peoples more freeflowing.
I will add another topic later. I trimmed this down because it had originally two points of discussion.
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Aug 24, 2011 23:04:51 GMT 3
I don't remember any German Turkologist who opposed the Altaic theory, but the British Turkologist Sir Gerard Clauson did.
|
|
|
Post by jamyangnorbu on Aug 25, 2011 17:49:19 GMT 3
Claus Schönig is a contemporary German critic of the Altaic hypothesis. He proposes that many of the common words found in Mongolian and Turkic languages can be discerned as borrowings between the languages at different stages when under a diacrhonic ana. He has a good piece in Routledge's The Mongolic Languages.
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Aug 26, 2011 17:45:04 GMT 3
That is also what Clauson thought. I incline to think that way too.
|
|