|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Jun 3, 2007 23:11:53 GMT 3
Barulas (Barlas) was a Mongol tribe, not Turkic. Back in the 14th century, the name Turk was used for all Altaic peoples.
|
|
|
|
Post by tangriberdi on Jun 4, 2007 1:46:28 GMT 3
but Barulas is a Mongol tribe, there is no reason to make him more Turkic, it doesn't matter. No it is not. Barlas tribe one of those tribes which intermarried to Turkic tribes and acquired a Turkic identity. They were no more Mongols but just Turks. |
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Jun 4, 2007 23:45:03 GMT 3
They were a Turkified Mongol tribe  They were Mongol in origin but Turkic in culture. |
|
|
|
Post by ceonni on Jan 26, 2008 9:20:05 GMT 3
|
|
pantigin
Tudun
Without Uighurs, there was no Mahmud and without him, there is no complete stories of Turks !
Posts: 164
|
Post by pantigin on Feb 5, 2008 23:30:17 GMT 3
actually, there are 17,000 kyrgyzs are living in chichihar of heilongjiang province in china. also more than 120,000 "Jian clan" uighurs living in taoyuan uighur autonomous county of hunan province. Mr. jianbaozan was Maozedong's history teacher in Hunan normal school. he was the first man who made the systematic theory for 5000 years history of china.
|
|
They were Mongol in origin but Turkic in culture.