Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2008 12:25:52 GMT 3
I always thought that Azeri was the most understandable dialect for most Turks.
|
|
pantigin
Tudun
Without Uighurs, there was no Mahmud and without him, there is no complete stories of Turks !
Posts: 164
|
Post by pantigin on Mar 18, 2008 10:12:00 GMT 3
The Arabic language is a Semitic language with many varieties that diverge widely from one another -¡ª both from country to country and within a single country. This entry looks at these varieties of Arabic, distinguishing them from Classical/Standard Arabic and from each other. In sociolinguistic terms, Arabic in its native environment typically occurs in a "diglossic" situation, meaning that native speakers learn and use two substantially different language forms in different aspects of their lives. In the case of Arabic, the regionally prevalent variety is learned as a speaker's mother tongue and is used for nearly all everyday speaking situations throughout life, including most films and plays, and (rarely) in some literature. A second, quite different variety, Standard Arabic, is learned in school and is used for most printed material, TV news reporting and interviews, sermons and other formal situations. The extent to which the local vernacular tends to interplay with the Standard variety in formal situations varies from country to country.
|
|
|
Post by aykurt on Sept 26, 2008 22:10:56 GMT 3
I think a standard or new Turkic language should be developed. With Orkhon Turkic used as a base for it. With this basis it can be developed into a modern functioning language by working on common words of Turkic roots in the modern Turkic dialects. Turkic languages and dialects are rich in vocabulary. Ive heard some people say that modern turkish is rich because of its words of persian and arabic origin. But just looking at the variations and range of Turkic words shows that a rich Common Turkic language is possible and can be just as descriptive as modern english. Check out this link starling.rinet.ru/cgi-bin/response.cgi?root=config&morpho=0&basename=\data\alt\turcet&first=1Etymologically, words sharing the same roots can have slight differences in meaning depending on the dialect or language. By making the most of these differences a language based purely on Turkic can be developed without all the loanwords that affect nearly all modern Turkic languages. Also you dont need a United Turkic States to develop a common language. There isnt a united Arab state. With modern technology and media and the opening up of borders, there hasnt been a better time in our history than now to go ahead and finally have the opportunity to bring all the Turkic people together. If not within a state then at least the ability to talk and understand each other.
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Sept 27, 2008 19:28:14 GMT 3
That's a great link Aykurt, thank you very much for the share
|
|
|
Post by ALTAR on Sept 27, 2008 22:58:54 GMT 3
We should form a common language and alphabet with our brothers quickly. However it seems impossible in the current situation of Turkey.
|
|
|
Post by Atabeg on Sept 28, 2008 1:07:37 GMT 3
I think Uzbek is the most understandable Turkish
and an esperanto is just farfetched
I stay by my point wich i have made several times
every branck should have it's representative
Like Kazakh for the Kypchak branch and Azeri for the oghuz branch and uzbek for the south eastern branch
|
|
|
Post by atemurtas on Jan 3, 2009 6:31:31 GMT 3
One would wish that natural development of dialects is good. Yet the benefits of one language to all communities is not deniable.
Chineese model is not possible in altaic geography. European model is a political one, not language, and is the ultimate objective.
Whichever aspect of unity one aims at, the process ought to be one of research and practice. I understand that the studies of language matters have been intense in the last decade relatively. However if one compares it, lets say to west, one has to note the amount of resources dedicated to such studies is very limited. More interdialect research would set the trend to practice of the better attributes of the dialects, of course the main three languages would automatically have more weight.
Jews after 2000 years, reconstructed the Hebrew language and use it as their national language in Israel. It is viable to have common language news web sites as a start.
Practical gains on certain aspect similar to language would bring together these communities faster than a possible political structure attempt.
Comments are much appreciated...
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Jan 4, 2009 1:30:15 GMT 3
I agree.
|
|
|
Post by tangriberdi on Jan 28, 2012 3:24:30 GMT 3
Here is Turkic Esparanto, www.turukca.com I think it is very interesting and highlu intelligible for many different Turkic peoples.
|
|
|
Post by tangriberdi on Feb 23, 2012 20:56:08 GMT 3
I really wonder what you think about constructed language whose link is given above.
|
|