|
|
Post by Arkhanson on Mar 28, 2005 17:17:38 GMT 3
panzer tank:  sherman  |
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Mar 31, 2005 22:23:08 GMT 3
Definitially Panzer (but which model? there are huge differences between Panzer I and Panzer IV)  IMO American, British, Italian, Japanese, French, etc tanks weren't of good quality when compared with German and Soviet tanks. |
|
|
|
Post by Arkhanson on Apr 8, 2005 13:38:18 GMT 3
But allied forcements had ability to build a tank quicker than axis cause all around the world war 2 there were built 13,000 Tiger tanks but allied soldiers built more than axis tigers cause tiger tanks are moýre complicated rather than sherman tank
|
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Apr 11, 2005 23:35:10 GMT 3
And the German tanks were more qualified  |
|
|
|
Post by Arkhanson on Apr 15, 2005 12:11:58 GMT 3
|
|
|
|
Post by Jagatai Khan on Sept 17, 2006 21:15:42 GMT 3
T-34s rules  |
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Sept 18, 2006 0:16:34 GMT 3
But you should choose one selection in this poll ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Jagatai Khan on Sept 18, 2006 23:38:30 GMT 3
I have let my vote to go for PZs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nomad (Daz) on Sept 19, 2006 16:42:52 GMT 3
Russians tanks were not so good as you may think. T-34 was very cheap in production. Life span of an engine was 600 km. More over the crew of the tank was not professional. After 1939 their were not much left from the professional. Most of them were shot or waiting for their death to come in Siberia. The crew was made from the drivers of tractors in farm yards. (Tractor- a powerfull motor vehicle with large rear wheels, used for pulling farm machinary). Russian propaganda was good to say T-34 rules.
If we compare T-34 to Panther II-III I think T-34 was more powerfull in firearms and armor but was lacking the pro crew. Germans had some 1st class people who could face any king of challenge with some great plan.
For me Panther rules
|
|
