Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Jun 4, 2010 13:57:48 GMT 3
I would never defy science. What I mean is one can not simply defy ideas just because that person is not a linguist. After all I'm talking about sounds and the ideas they carry. Or shapes and the thoughts they carry.
But you are not a linguist (me neither) and you think professional linguists are wrong, and you reach to conclusions even though you're not in the field. It would be wrong if I would make some claims about physics without getting professional education in that field
I have another idea. The + sign in a circle consists of two Gammas intersecting on a single point in a circle (idea?). It is stable only if "two" Gammas are together and symmetric, just like the roof of a Yurt.
Özdeş, yurttaş, yoldaş, sırdaş.. I think the "(d)aş" suffix carry within itself, the same meaning.
Lets take the sırdaş example:
There are two persons, they share the same secret, they have to know the same thing otherwise they wouldn't share a secret. (if one of them reveals the secret to someone else it no longer is a shared secret) They take the power of being sırdaş from sharing the same secret. It would have no meaning if one of them didn't keep the secret.
Lets take the Özdeş example:
There are two concepts, they are the same "in concept" (two gammas in the ⊕ shape). They are concepts in the same boundary (idea) (the circle around the gammas in the ⊕ shape) If one of the gammas was a different shape, they no longer would be "özdeş" or same. The gammas intersect on the same point; meaning they have the same conclusion.
Özdeş, yurttaş, yoldaş, sırdaş.. I think the "(d)aş" suffix carry within itself, the same meaning.
Lets take the sırdaş example:
There are two persons, they share the same secret, they have to know the same thing otherwise they wouldn't share a secret. (if one of them reveals the secret to someone else it no longer is a shared secret) They take the power of being sırdaş from sharing the same secret. It would have no meaning if one of them didn't keep the secret.
Lets take the Özdeş example:
There are two concepts, they are the same "in concept" (two gammas in the ⊕ shape). They are concepts in the same boundary (idea) (the circle around the gammas in the ⊕ shape) If one of the gammas was a different shape, they no longer would be "özdeş" or same. The gammas intersect on the same point; meaning they have the same conclusion.
Sorry, I honestly don't understand your conclusion Yes, the -dAş suffix (it's not -[d]Aş, because it HAS the d letter, and is not single as -aş) is used for sharing, but it has nothing to do with power
I think every single word and sound meant the same thing many years ago. And it was the idea of Tengri. I'm really serious.
Yes, probably in the earliest days of Homo Sapiens, they did Regarding that being the idea of Tengri, I don't and can't believe it.
PS: I mixed the prefix and suffix part on my previous post
Here is a picture of Hızır and Alexander The Great.
[image]
Here is Yin Yang:
[image]
Here is Haç:
[image]
Here is a picture of Hızır and Alexander The Great.
[image]
Here is Yin Yang:
[image]
Here is Haç:
[image]
But the Yin-Yang symbol is a different symbol from the cross, with different meanings.