|
Post by aynur on Apr 13, 2013 15:16:26 GMT 3
Nogai
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Jan 12, 2013 13:15:06 GMT 3
Göktürk
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Dec 25, 2012 18:37:52 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Aug 31, 2012 16:42:49 GMT 3
Interesting. I always wondered how a confrontation between the Franks and the Magyars would look like.
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Aug 31, 2012 16:26:34 GMT 3
Explain the reason of posting this topic and presenting the information above.
You may call me ignorant, but I fail to see how any of this is tied in any way with traditional steppe history. Half of what I read, I didn't even understand because I'm hardly aware of what you're talking about. The events following World War I in the Middle East, or something else?
Historical study that is motivated by politics is outright stupid and contributes to absolutely nothing.
E: Furthermore, I believe the Jews (meaning those who do not conform to the Zionist theses) have made it very clear that they forbid/do not allow themselves to form a state of their own.
But the formation of Israel is another thing entirely.
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Aug 10, 2012 19:58:42 GMT 3
Dude, Attila was not a Lapp either. He does look like a Finnic tribesman in that picture. Yet another inaccurate portrayal. Probably laughed most at Omar Sharif as Genghis Khan.
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Aug 10, 2012 19:54:40 GMT 3
Seljuks/Turkomen
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Apr 30, 2012 15:10:22 GMT 3
Those are some really nice depictions of Seljuks, matmohair.
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Apr 23, 2012 16:43:07 GMT 3
Those are some really good pictures. It brings out the unique pattern of nomadic warfare and combines it with the harsh conditions of the Siberian north. The Sakha must have been tough warriors.
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Apr 10, 2012 19:28:26 GMT 3
There was a major tribe or people in south-eastern Mongolia called Tatars. It was them who murdered Genghis Khan's father Yesugei.
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Apr 8, 2012 11:55:35 GMT 3
Cuman Khazars
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Apr 8, 2012 7:54:01 GMT 3
That makes sense. All of the over-exaggeration seems to stem from both sides of the extreme spectrum, with Zionists claiming that the Khazars were their ancestors and far-right Christians and neo-Nazis saying they supposedly control the world's banking and industries.
There's substantial evidence out there saying that the Khazars were originally a Tengriist-oriented nation, giving one no doubt of their Turkic origin. Sure, a sizable portion of the Khazar elite may have adopted Judaism to seek a neutral stance in the growing Islam-Christianity conflict, but some people choose ignorance and continue to rant this 'Ashkenazi Jews are Khazars' thing over and over again. Quite laughable.
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Apr 7, 2012 18:05:09 GMT 3
During the last few months I've been curious about the overall society and structure of the Khazar Khaganate, but I keep bumping into this 'Khazars are Ashkenazi Jews' thing almost everywhere.
If I want to search for visual material or pictures of Khazar warriors, pretty much the only thing I get to see is Israelis with black hats and beards. Now, it bugs me. Where on Earth did people first come up with this idea? Is it some type of new trend or rooted somewhere else in past history? Because as far as I'm concerned, most Khazars identify themselves as Muslim and Kazakh and live in southern Russia/Kazakhstan/Caucasus and have nothing to do with Jewish people.
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Mar 17, 2012 23:30:15 GMT 3
|
|
|
Post by aynur on Mar 17, 2012 18:13:36 GMT 3
United States is controlled by the same Germanic ethnic consortium of international bankers and financiers who fund and create wars and conflicts in Third World countries for sheer profit and power, and present the old pattern of old western propaganda in all of our history books -- that Egypt was the world's first civilization, although we know for sure that it's not the case. Archaeologists have found structures over 10,000 years old throughout the Middle East and Western Africa.
Freemasons from Europe and the U.S. continue to rob Mesoamerican and, more importantly, African artifacts centuries if not millenia old from tribes and nations that have lived in those areas long before they came. It's a systematic dumbing down of the entire world that turns down real knowledge and presents completely cheap and phony 'facts' in the indoctrination books we were given when we were children and early adolescents. Religious fanaticism was just another way for the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry (originally the Knight Templar) to provide them with a widespread geographical conflict between two equally evil institutions so that they could plunder and scavenge any ancient knowledge for themselves, keeping it in the dark from others. And wasn't Christopher Columbus a fake explorer? Modern 'history education', if you want to call it that, has become like a rotten tomato. You have to see through the facade and do research and look for information by yourself, not expect teachers to tell you the 'truth' that the people at the top would want you to hear. Do I sound like a conspiracy theorist? Maybe, but all the events in world history point to the same direction. There's no such thing as a coincidence in this life.
|
|