|
|
Post by arnewise12 on Oct 31, 2008 0:48:09 GMT 3
I was reading the history of central asia and it come across my mind that many dynasties that ruled iran have been of turkic origin, can the qajars also be counted as that , since they are from the region from were the turkmens in iran live in. there is a pic of founder of the qajar dynasty, agha mohammed khan www.iranchamber.com/history/qajar/qajar.php |
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Oct 31, 2008 2:40:03 GMT 3
There is no way they are Persian.
|
|
|
|
Post by Azadan Januspar on Oct 31, 2008 2:53:32 GMT 3
They are of Turkmen origin I have heard that there are still members of that tribe in some parts of today Turkmenistan. But later they got Persianized as they took the throne of Iran.
|
|
|
|
Post by ALTAR on Oct 31, 2008 9:49:39 GMT 3
Marjane Satrapi the famous author of PERSEPOLİS(fictionalized as an anime movie) is also from Qajar Dynasty.
Musaddegh(ex-prime minister of Iran, he was overthrown by Shah Muhammad Reza Pehlevi and CIA) was also from Qajar Dynasty from his maternal side. He spoke Turkish fluently and had a strong Turk Identity.
|
|
|
|
Post by Azadan Januspar on Nov 8, 2008 1:39:24 GMT 3
He was from his maternal side Qajar, considering that his father was of pure Iranian origin that never means he belonged to the Qajar dynasty and he never declared of strong Turkic identity.
Some corrections: its Pahlavi not Pehlevi (which is the Turkish way of pronouncing it, not inernational).
|
|
|
|
Post by ALTAR on Nov 8, 2008 10:27:05 GMT 3
He was from his maternal side Qajar, considering that his father was of pure Iranian origin that never means he belonged to the Qajar dynasty and he never declared of strong Turkic identity. Some corrections: its Pahlavi not Pehlevi (which is the Turkish way of pronouncing it, not inernational). " Musaddegh(ex-prime minister of Iran, he was overthrown by Shah Muhammad Reza Pehlevi and CIA) [ b]was also from Qajar Dynasty from his maternal side[/b][/u]." Are you blind ? I know his father was Ashtiyani. So that I didnot write it. And declaration of his Turkishness. After the Coup L'tat of CIA and Pahlavis, he said that "I am Turkish and Turk Nationalist" in his court (Source: Ethnic Structure of Iran - Ayghun Attar Hashimzade) In 1952, A Turkish journalist Altemur Kılıç interviewed with him. In the begining, the journalist came to meeting with a Persian Translator. However, Mussadegh said him "I am also a Turk and I can speak Turkish like you." (Source: Altemur Kılıç - Memories) The interview was going on in Turkish. The first wife of Muhammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, Princess Sorayya also accused him with favoring Qajar Dynasty and Iran Turks rights against Pahlavi Dynasty. (Princess Soraya: Autobiography of Her Imperial Highness) |
|
|
|
Post by H. İhsan Erkoç on Nov 8, 2008 16:16:26 GMT 3
Thanx for the share  |
|
|
|
Post by Azadan Januspar on Nov 8, 2008 23:21:10 GMT 3
According to whom?! But thanks any way I didn't know that they say those kind of things even for Mosadegh. Am I blind?! No! knowing Turkish doesnt mean he considered himself a Turk. He was trying to find a settlement with Qashqais who rebelled those times. So for accusing him, they spotlighted his friendly relations with some of their leaders, besides he maternally was connected to the Qajars, who were detested those times. |
|
|
|
Post by ALTAR on Nov 9, 2008 9:14:29 GMT 3
According to whom?! But thanks any way I didn't know that they say those kind of things even for Mosadegh. Am I blind?! No! knowing Turkish doesnt mean he considered himself a Turk. He was trying to find a settlement with Qashqais who rebelled those times. So for accusing him, they spotlighted his friendly relations with some of their leaders, besides he maternally was connected to the Qajars, who were detested those times. He didnot speak only Turkish. He also identied himself as a Turk. So that he is Turk. There would be many things that we dont know ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Azadan Januspar on Nov 9, 2008 11:01:59 GMT 3
Yeah guess who has written about the ethnic structure of Iran. I mean what a reliable source. The thing about them is their innovation in development of science of history ;D Again he identified himself as Turk according to such a source, ey?! ;D fortunately it's contemporary history. And yeah I don't think saying that a person can speak Turkish ever means he couldn't speak French, English etc.?! But I guess there are things people have already started to know |
|
|
|
Post by ALTAR on Nov 9, 2008 15:37:27 GMT 3
;D ;D Yeah guess who has written about the ethnic structure of Iran. I mean what a reliable source. The thing about them is their innovation in development of science of history ;D Again he identified himself as Turk according to such a source, ey?! ;D fortunately it's contemporary history. And yeah I don't think saying that a person can speak Turkish ever means he couldn't speak French, English etc.?! But I guess there are things people have already started to know I am lucky that I can write this kind of reliable source. If we try to comparison with yours, It leads to be a disaster ;D Prof. Dr. Ayghun Attar Hashimzade is a historian which is known with his works about Azerbaijan, Iran, Armenian Terror and Ottoman-Safevid Rivalry. Ethnic Structure of Iran is one of his works. He put this Musaddeghs Turk Identity from another international source. ( H.E Chehabi Iranian Politics and Religious Modernism, I.B Tauris LTD Publishers, London 1990) I wrote it bigger. You aren't blind but an unobservant ;D I put two sources in my previous. One of them was from your ex-Royal Family. If you dont want to believe or take them serious. It's your problem, not mine  In my first post, I said Musaddegh had a strong Turk Identity. Not he is completely racially Turk. Its different. Sorry, you have some problems in your eye so that I wrote there big again and I dont want to think that you had a problem in your brain with all my respect. I hope you get the point this time. It seems a bit difficult but please try it for this forums folks huh ! If you refuse Musaddeghs had Turk Identity. Why dont you put your own sources that he said "I am Persian". I reply for you Because you haven any of them ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Azadan Januspar on Nov 11, 2008 5:49:48 GMT 3
;D seems you have gone so far relying on your source buddy!even somehow beyond the rules of forum by mentioning childish insults of yours, for which there's no need to respond as they speak themselves for what you really are ;D what is it? you knew his father was a Bakhtiari so you didn't find it necessary to say. And at the same time you only wrote that his mother Najm al -Saltane was from Qajar dynasty.! That means you didn't know that his mother was from Qajars?! ridiculous Well you wrote his, didn't you? Persian is a term used by Pan-Turkits refering to the people speaking Persian! this is a strategy to take Kurds, baluchis, Lurs etc, who are not ethnically Persians from other Iranians. I myself am Iranian not a Persian man! you lost it. Yeah you predict my lack of sources. go on and keep replying like this. Fortunately like I earlier said it's contemporary history and the sources for such thing is quite abundant, besides its not the first time Pan-turkists tried to seize prominent figure of other lands, most notable of them Iran which is expriencing one its weakest times in its culture, being a good prey, thnik the Pan-Turks. As you may never imagined as a sensational reader that Dr.Mossadegh, one of the leaders of the "National Front" of Iran and a person as prime minister who did a huge job by declaring the "Nationalization of Iranian oild industry of Iran" after winning in la hague court, has also wrote his biography and memories in two books "Memories" and "Calamites" these papers wrote by him in his prison time and were hand over to his sons who eventually published them. Interesting that he never identified himself in these two books as a Turk! always identified himself as an Iranian always concerned with the people of Iran, never showed any praise for Qajar dynasty and being proud of being half related to Qajars. And unlike many pan-turkists he never mourned for the dusk of Qajars and yelled about the dawn of Pahlavis, never said anything about his ability of Turkish though he may had it like many on those times, he never commented about the unsuccessful attempt of disintegration of Azerbaigan province by Pan guys and USSR. I know that you and Mr.Attar already knew that but to others' surprise I firstly start with a part of foreword by Dr.Gholamhossein Mossadegh his son: "My father loved two things more than anything, Iran and his mother." the books might be availabe for online sale I dont know but the book I saw was of course in Persian, two in one book can be translated as "Memories and Calamities of Mossadegh" by a foreword of his son.ISBN 964-404-040-6 The other Good source apart his own workd is "All the Shah's men" By Stephen Kinzer the New York times journalist of the time who gives first hand infos on the issues of Mohammad Reza Shah and the coup d'etat. Another is Evrand Abrahamian, Iran between two revolutions. Dr.Mosaddegh wrote almost about everything in his books other than a mere indication of "I am a Turk and a Turk Nationalist"! But no worries the relevance of that source still reimans to checked. yeah some folks try to identify everyone as Turks. But it is wierd why he personally identified himself as a Turk in his books. So far I checked google book as the first step of the credibility of Mr.Aygun Attar reference to this book. books.google.com/books?id=JJEIQbUnGyYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=chehabiyou guys search for keywords youself. Thanks you are really smart man. ;D I didn't say either. however he is to some extent racially Turk and he never identified himself a Turk. |
|
|
|
Post by ALTAR on Nov 11, 2008 10:55:13 GMT 3
;D seems you have gone so far relying on your source buddy!even somehow beyond the rules of forum by mentioning childish insults of yours, for which there's no need to respond as they speak themselves for what you really are ;D what is it? you knew his father was a Bakhtiari so you didn't find it necessary to say. And at the same time you only wrote that his mother Najm al -Saltane was from Qajar dynasty.! That means you didn't know that his mother was from Qajars?! ridiculous. Well you wrote his, didn't you? Persian is a term used by Pan-Turkits refering to the people speaking Persian! this is a strategy to take Kurds, baluchis, Lurs etc, who are not ethnically Persians from other Iranians. I myself am Iranian not a Persian man! you lost it. Yeah you predict my lack of sources. go on and keep replying like this. Fortunately like I earlier said it's contemporary history and the sources for such thing is quite abundant, besides its not the first time Pan-turkists tried to seize prominent figure of other lands, most notable of them Iran which is expriencing one its weakest times in its culture, being a good prey, thnik the Pan-Turks. As you may never imagined as a sensational reader that Dr.Mossadegh, one of the leaders of the "National Front" of Iran and a person as prime minister who did a huge job by declaring the "Nationalization of Iranian oild industry of Iran" after winning in la hague court, has also wrote his biography and memories in two books "Memories" and "Calamites" these papers wrote by him in his prison time and were hand over to his sons who eventually published them. Interesting that he never identified himself in these two books as a Turk! always identified himself as an Iranian always concerned with the people of Iran, never showed any praise for Qajar dynasty and being proud of being half related to Qajars. And unlike many pan-turkists he never mourned for the dusk of Qajars and yelled about the dawn of Pahlavis, never said anything about his ability of Turkish though he may had it like many on those times, he never commented about the unsuccessful attempt of disintegration of Azerbaigan province by Pan guys and USSR. "My father loved two things more than anything, Iran and his mother." the books might be availabe for online sale I dont know but the book I saw was of course in Persian, two in one book can be translated as "Memories and Calamities of Mossadegh" by a foreword of his son.ISBN 964-404-040-6 The other Good source apart his own workd is "All the Shah's men" By Stephen Kinzer the New York times journalist of the time who gives first hand infos on the issues of Mohammad Reza Shah and the coup d'etat. Another is Evrand Abrahamian, Iran between two revolutions. Dr.Mosaddegh wrote almost about everything in his books other than a mere indication of "I am a Turk and a Turk Nationalist"! But no worries the relevance of that source still reimans to checked. yeah some folks try to identify everyone as Turks. But it is wierd why he personally identified himself as a Turk in his books. So far I checked google book as the first step of the credibility of Mr.Aygun Attar reference to this book. books.google.com/books?id=JJEIQbUnGyYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=chehabiyou guys search for keywords youself. Thanks you are really smart man. ;D I didn't say either. however he is to some extent racially Turk and he never identified himself a Turk.
I never deny his fathers ethnicity. If I can write it, it shows my objectivity about the subject.
Ah sorry, if you are embarrassed Persianity, its your own problem. You can say that I am not Persian but Iranian. You choose it. But Why did you refuse Musaddegh had a Turk ıdentity although he had an Ashtiyani father.
I never say Musaddegh is Panturkist. You started writing conspiracy theories again ;D
Did I say Musaddegh didnot like Iran. It was a reality that he was an Iran Patriot more than your ex-royal family who cooperated with CIA and British Imperialism ;D
I had never do it. However, you did it in all posts. Like Converting Azerbaijan and other Turks in Iran to Iranian or Persian  .
I put the sources. He can speak Turkish, He had Turkish Ancestry and Culture. Believe or not, its your own problem. I or anybody in this forum dont have to satisfy you about the sources or any other thing. What are you? God? Prophet?. Nothing, only a member of this board in the internet. Please leave this Half-God mode. I prefer that you would be Zoroasthrian ;D
Lastly Musaddegh was attacked and criticisized by many Shah Loyalists and off course Lovely Pan Iranists ;D. Especially, Pan Iranists saw his as nearly same with communists although he wasn't a communist. This is the best proove that Pan Iranists attacked him because he was from Qajars and Turkic barbaric invaders of Iran. ;D
I love this Pan-Iranists point of view. They Refuse Musaddeghs Turk Identity but they accept the persons like Kesrevi as Iranians or Persians who was from Tabriz and an Azerbaijan Turk but defended Pan-Iranist Theories. They are so funny ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Azadan Januspar on Nov 11, 2008 17:43:16 GMT 3
Seems Mr Altar from his insults came up with the comparison with childish and logical matters. No buddy in contraray to your sayings: - there is a great source and this is Mossadeghs own memories, in which he never identified himself as Turk. besides there were many politicians of Qajar lineage during those times who never identified themselves as Turk. only your Mr Aygun Attar suddenly comes to a point to emphasize such sentences in order to follow some plans. and thinks people are blind You need to apologize to yourself cause you are wasting your time . I dont have any Persianity! ;D sad dude! And members of this forum can check my writing to see how identified myself Persian or Iranian ( Again want to say to Pan-Turks -who sought an enemy and chose Iran, because its left kind of defensless, and they use words like Persians, Fars to confine the Iranians only to Persians- You lost it! Iranians are not all Persians and the awareness is becoming dominant amongst the Iranians Kurd, Lur, Baluchis and Persians as they observe the movements of Pan-Turks) I didnt say you said so, just wanted to show in every line that he unlike you may have wished, didnt identified himself as a Turk. had no sympathy to the Qajars either. what? you ok?! ;D converting Azerbaigan to Iranian or Persian?! oh you need to take some time and relieve yourself. Azerbaigan was always a part of Iran but its members are a mixture of Iranian-Turkmen. My ex-royal family?! what a sensational nonsense is that again? Shah regime was tyrannic with many faults but during its age lived many notable patriots like Mossadegh. ( The weird point that you guys may notice that some Pan-Turks all over the Turkic world have thing with that regime in Iran is that during those times Pan-turk efforts with military support of USSR, to disintegrate Azerbaigan province of Iran though seemed promising, with intelligence of the then time primem inister remained fruitless. So Pan-turks even from Turkey started to talk and write about that regime like they are living in Iran.) I didnt deny that he could speak Turkish. his semi Turkish ancestry if you insist are from his maternal side and from Qajar a high iranicized dynasty of Turkmen origin which intermingled vastly with Iranians and always culturaly considered themselves Iranian rather than Turk. besides you don't have to satisfy me I will study your source anyhow I gave contradictory to your sayings Mossadeghs own memories and autobiography. hehe i don't doing such thing has anything to do with God or Prophet! You prefer what?! well thats private thing and none of your business. Yes he was attacked and criticised many time by those Royalists, whose sayings and writings about him today has no academic importance just propaganda but they atatcked him mostly for his deeds I myself never happen to see a crticism on his metrnal origin many of crticisms are to be found on a book wrote by Mohammad Reza Shah "My mission for my country" none of them regarding him a Qajar and the very crticisms of Shah got proper response by Mossadegh himself in his memories and calamities And some royalist of less knowledge ccrticised him of being related to Qajars didn't ever mean they wanted to crticise turkic origin of Qajar but the thing is that the Qajars were former dynasty and incompetent thus Pahlavis as their rivals, so they had anti-Qajar view yet many members of the Qajar family become politicans in then time Iran with no ban. First of all I should put that pan-Iranism as a movemnet mainy to defend Iran against offensive pan-Arabism or pan-Turkism never exitsed like the both of them. You can compare it yourself : Pan-Turkism's hundreds of years spreading lies, trying to practically cut Azerbaigan from Iran, cultural attempt's to seize figures like Nezami, Molavi, Babak even Zoroastra, Arsacids etc. with the vice versa from Iranian side like claims over lost cities of Iran. what do you conclude guys? I want to draw attention of others to this issue: As you could already see Altars sayings here and in some othe thread, that he and mainly Pan-Turkists do detest Kasravi, as you surf the web you may also notice that some guys from even distant Kazakhstan may have also such opinion. let me clarify this: Kasravi was a researcher (one difference of his works with Pan-Turkist authors is the vast reliable references alongside his works from many inetrnational, Arabic primary sources. you can see it yourself) his works in field of history were very precise always with citations from early Islamic citations for instance. He was a pioneer in introducing the existence of the former language of province of Azerbaygan as "Azari Pahlavi" (i.e. a middle iranian language) by studying some scattered traces of its existence in some parts of Azerbaigan besides discovery of many middle Iranian words in todays Azeri Turkish language, thus effectively put an end to the Pan-Turkist propagandas of the constant existence of Azeri Turkish language in this province therefore trying to claim that Turkmens always existed in Azerbaigan. The other work in his History of Azerbaygan a brilliant work, is the emphasizing the false onomasticon of the recently established republic of Azerbaygan on a land, which he proved by quoting many pre-islamic and Islamic sources that was adjacent to Azarbaygan and were alwasy called by the name "Arran" so he before the USSR, Pan-Turkist try to sieze Iranian province of Azerbaigan, he warned Iranians about the aim of aftermaths of such naming to this republic. His related works to this forum are: - History of Azerbaygan - Unknown Rulers ( an interesting research on the medieval local rulers of Iran of course those of Azarbaygan like Shadadian) He had in some fields like religion extreme ideas and that's another thing. But in his works he never denied partial Turkic ancestry of Azerbaiganis of Iran even stated and proved that they Azerbayganis have great extent Arab ancestry via Arab migrations of early Islam. That's why he's become one of the most behated figures in Pan-Turkist agenda, but to anyone who has a doubt about it I'd suggest to read his historical work and compare them with some Pan-turkists works of the same subject. |
|
|
|
Post by ALTAR on Nov 11, 2008 21:21:57 GMT 3
No buddy in contraray to your sayings: - there is a great source and this is Mossadeghs own memories, in which he never identified himself as Turk. besides there were many politicians of Qajar lineage during those times who never identified themselves as Turk. only your Mr Aygun Attar suddenly comes to a point to emphasize such sentences in order to follow some plans. and thinks people are blind There was a big pressure against Turks of Iran in Pahlavi and Mullah Regimes. So that he couldnt wrote this in his memories and you said that his son published them. Maybe his son didnt share same ideas with his father. I have to see the memories. Is there any English Translation of the memories? You need to apologize to yourself cause you are wasting your time . I dont have any Persianity! ;D sad dude! And members of this forum can check my writing to see how identified myself Persian or Iranian ( Again want to say to Pan-Turks -who sought an enemy and chose Iran, because its left kind of defensless, and they use words like Persians, Fars to confine the Iranians only to Persians- You lost it! Iranians are not all Persians and the awareness is becoming dominant amongst the Iranians Kurd, Lur, Baluchis and Persians as they observe the movements of Pan-Turks) I have no attention to your choosing of identity, nationality, raciality or whatever you want to be. ;D If you wanna be a guy from Mars planet. You will be so . Who cares ? ;D But I hope you arenot a kurd, baluch or lur. They are completely disgusting for me than Persians. ;D I didnt say you said so, just wanted to show in every line that he unlike you may have wished, didnt identified himself as a Turk. had no sympathy to the Qajars either. I didn't wish. The sources that I read claimed it. However you dont accept them. It doesnot bother me at all. I still defend that I wrote. Princess Sorayya dont think like you buddy. So I dont take your this claim serious. She accused him as Qajar supporter many times in her memories. My ex-royal family?! what a sensational nonsense is that again? Shah regime was tyrannic with many faults but during its age lived many notable patriots like Mossadegh. ( The weird point that you guys may notice that some Pan-Turks all over the Turkic world have thing with that regime in Iran is that during those times Pan-turk efforts with military support of USSR, to disintegrate Azerbaigan province of Iran though seemed promising, with intelligence of the then time primem inister remained fruitless. So Pan-turks even from Turkey started to talk and write about that regime like they are living in Iran.) You forgot that Shah Regime and Soviet Stalin agreed to destruction of Azerbaijan into two sperate regions. One of them was depended to Soviets, other was to Pahlavi Iran. I didnt deny that he could speak Turkish. his semi Turkish ancestry if you insist are from his maternal side and from Qajar a high iranicized dynasty of Turkmen origin which intermingled vastly with Iranians and always culturaly considered themselves Iranian rather than Turk. besides you don't have to satisfy me I will study your source anyhow I gave contradictory to your sayings Mossadeghs own memories and autobiography. hehe i don't doing such thing has anything to do with God or Prophet! You prefer what?! well thats private thing and none of your business. When they called themselves mostly Iranian. Ok. But one of them wasn't ;D The majority was yours, you can own them. I respect. ;D I gave the reasons why I can't agree with you in the above. Yes he was attacked and criticised many time by those Royalists, whose sayings and writings about him today has no academic importance just propaganda but they atatcked him mostly for his deeds I myself never happen to see a crticism on his metrnal origin many of crticisms are to be found on a book wrote by Mohammad Reza Shah "My mission for my country" none of them regarding him a Qajar and the very crticisms of Shah got proper response by Mossadegh himself in his memories and calamities And some royalist of less knowledge ccrticised him of being related to Qajars didn't ever mean they wanted to crticise turkic origin of Qajar but the thing is that the Qajars were former dynasty and incompetent thus Pahlavis as their rivals, so they had anti-Qajar view yet many members of the Qajar family become politicans in then time Iran with no ban. These attacks couldn't make without order of Mohammed Reza Shah. It was impossible because Many of the Musaddegh oppositers(Shah Loyalists, Shia Clerics, Pan Iranists etc.) were directed by him with the asistance of CIA and British Intelligence. Look at Norman Scwarzkopfs(Commander of Anti-Saddam Alliance Forces in the First Gulf War) Memories. He told his fathers(His father was the commander of Iran Gendermarie) mission in Iran against Musaddegh. How they throwned Musaddeghs Government. First of all I should put that pan-Iranism as a movemnet mainy to defend Iran against offensive pan-Arabism or pan-Turkism never exitsed like the both of them. You can compare it yourself : Pan-Turkism's hundreds of years spreading lies, trying to practically cut Azerbaigan from Iran, cultural attempt's to seize figures like Nezami, Molavi, Babak even Zoroastra, Arsacids etc. with the vice versa from Iranian side like claims over lost cities of Iran. what do you conclude guys? I supported your struggle against Pan-Arabism. Because I also hate them. Arabs are also a danger for Turk Nation and States like jews too. Its my own idea. There are many inobjective articles about the history of Iran and Azerbaijan. I also don't agree most of them. However, You have to agree and admit that there are also some people who had chavaunistic behaviours, writings too. Making Qashgai Nomads Carpets as Ancient Persian Carpets, Converting Turkic Dynasties as Real Persian or Iranian Governors, denying Azerbaijan and Iran Turks Existence etc. I want to draw attention of others to this issue: As you could already see Altars sayings here and in some othe thread, that he and mainly Pan-Turkists do detest Kasravi, as you surf the web you may also notice that some guys from even distant Kazakhstan may have also such opinion. let me clarify this: Kasravi was a researcher (one difference of his works with Pan-Turkist authors is the vast reliable references alongside his works from many inetrnational, Arabic primary sources. you can see it yourself) his works in field of history were very precise always with citations from early Islamic citations for instance. He was a pioneer in introducing the existence of the former language of province of Azerbaygan as "Azari Pahlavi" (i.e. a middle iranian language) by studying some scattered traces of its existence in some parts of Azerbaigan besides discovery of many middle Iranian words in todays Azeri Turkish language, thus effectively put an end to the Pan-Turkist propagandas of the constant existence of Azeri Turkish language in this province therefore trying to claim that Turkmens always existed in Azerbaigan. The other work in his History of Azerbaygan a brilliant work, is the emphasizing the false onomasticon of the recently established republic of Azerbaygan on a land, which he proved by quoting many pre-islamic and Islamic sources that was adjacent to Azarbaygan and were alwasy called by the name "Arran" so he before the USSR, Pan-Turkist try to sieze Iranian province of Azerbaigan, he warned Iranians about the aim of aftermaths of such naming to this republic. His related works to this forum are: - History of Azerbaygan - Unknown Rulers ( an interesting research on the medieval local rulers of Iran of course those of Azarbaygan like Shadadian) He had in some fields like religion extreme ideas and that's another thing. But in his works he never denied partial Turkic ancestry of Azerbaiganis of Iran even stated and proved that they Azerbayganis have great extent Arab ancestry via Arab migrations of early Islam. That's why he's become one of the most behated figures in Pan-Turkist agenda, but to anyone who has a doubt about it I'd suggest to read his historical work and compare them with some Pan-turkists works of the same subject. I simply say Kesrevi that he was a traitor and bought by Pahlavis with money. His main goal was assimilation of Azerbaijan Turks and Non-Iranic peoples in Iran and making Iran clean Aryan and Iranian country. But this policy was convicted to be unsuccesful. Although these policies, Turks Existence in Iran is till going on. Any regime cant change this forever. |
|
.